Insane Asylum of Phoenix – Arizona
The
construction of the Insane Asylum of Phoenix began in 1886. This massive
building was large enough to take in 280 patients and took eight months to
complete. The facility was officially opened in 1887. This building consisted of “three buildings
with 2 patient wings and a central administrative facility”, the building
followed the Kirkbride design in this way (Asylum Projects). The facility also
followed Kirkbride’s design as it was set on 160 acres of land allowing for
patients to involve themselves in the gardens and farming.
The Insane Asylum of Phoenix
was initially built in recognition that “mental illness is a state
responsibility” (Asylum Projects). A board of control, replacing the insane asylum
board, was established to create more strict guidelines to be followed regarding
“declarations of insanity, patient confinement, and terms of release” (Asylum
Projects). Individuals were committed for a range of reasons, due to a lack of institutions
in the area. These reasons were occurrences such as, “old age, tuberculosis,
and ‘feeblemindedness’” (Asylum Projects). Upon research, there is no personal
accounts of the experiences had by patients of the hospital.
Starting with the name
Insane Asylum of Phoenix, in 1902 the name was changed to “Territorial Asylum for
the Insane” and then changed again in 1924 to “Arizona State Hospital” (Asylum
Projects). Just as the name changed over time, so did the number of patients admit
to the hospital. The asylum started at 61 patients at the opening in 1887 and
by the early 1950’s there was close to 1,800 patients in the hospital (Asylum
Projects). As there was a better understanding of human rights and mental
illness, the hospital grew with these changes. There was stricter requirement
in receiving an “insane” diagnosis and well as a restriction that “made it
impossible to get in and easy to be released” (Asylum Projects). In 1973, the
current governor and the legislature developed the Arizona Department of Health
Services to oversee the mental health services for this facility.
Although it is not
clear how many staff members worked in this facility or how many patients
walked the halls, part of the 160 acres dedicated to this facility was a
graveyard dedicated to staff and patients. Currently, there are 2400 graves
dating back to 1888 (Asylum Projects). The records that are available for this facility
outline a higher patient to staff ratio, and also touches on understaffing
which is a common theme to the mental health world that we all know.
There are very
little records of the specific conditions of the asylum, so to the best of my
knowledge bad conditions were never exposed to the public. As this asylum seems
to follow Kirkbride’s design, I would feel comfortable being treated in this
facility. From the available information it seems as though individuals were
treated fairly and like human beings in this facility.
http://asylumprojects.org/index.php/Arizona_State_Hospital
Hi Kailyn,
ReplyDeleteI ran into the same thing with my asylum research - no details on conditions within the facility, but lots of vague statements about how "creepy" it was!
I find the included graveyard interesting - do you think this was because the patients were abandoned by their families, or was it just easier to bury people there rather than transporting them home? OR were they dying as a result of botched treatments and this covered it up??
I find it interesting as well that they made it harder to be admitted and easier to be discharged - seemed the exact opposite with many places at the time, so this is encouraging! Great post.
I did want more information about the graveyard but there wasn't more than what I discussed in my post. I am guessing that they were buried there for convenience or because they were abandoned by their families.
ReplyDeleteKailyn, I was pleasantly surprised to read that the Phoenix Asylum engaged in human treatment and was not involved in any abuse allegations! Asylums have a bad reputation for corruption and maltreatment, so it is comforting to think that there were some situations in which that was not that case and individuals were cared for with kindness.
ReplyDelete